Fullers Family Law Limited

I would not have rated this review at all if Yvonne Noble had not gotten involved.
A simple straight forward divorce was dragged on and the costs were getting sky high. Estimates were given but with a total unrealistic bandwidth.
Thanks to Yvonne's involvement the work on my divorce was done factual and without too much bureaucratic waiting time.
As a firm, I am not so sure about Fullers, the introduction meeting was very well and good to understand but after being handed over to the official staff, the language was all of a sudden not so straight-forward.
They keep on sending emails with attachments without mentioning in the email what the attachment is about and if there is a need to action.

Fullers family law were brilliant. Within 4 days of papers being signed and sent back, all was complete. No stress and explained pros and cons the whole way. Thank you.

This review is for a different branch.

This is my 3rd PAYG meeting with Jane-Louise Burrows via Fullers Family law. The PAYG arrangement works perfectly for me as I cannot currently afford full legal representation. Nothing but positive things to say!

This review is for a different branch.

From the beginning Sophie has not only been extremely professional but also very kind and considerate of my situation. A true asset to your firm.

This review is for a different branch.

I spent several months being advised on my divorce financial settlement by Fullers, but eventually moved firm. I had hoped to see someone local to where I live in Norwich and, although they say they are based in Norwich, I was allocated to lawyers who work elsewhere and never offered an in person meeting. In retrospect I feel this is very important in a divorce case. Online meetings often had very poor reception and I could hear myself talking back even after numerous attempts. Where matters are emotionally difficult, it just isn't the same as seeing a lawyer in person.

Fullers said they would do things in the most cost effective way possible, but for me, that seemed to mean using a para legal to do a lot of my work, which was then also looked at by a solicitor if necessary. Both the solicitor and para legal were very nice people, but I often found there were mistakes eg in spelling, grammar, or more serious factual errors like mentioning "domestic violence" where the correct term was "domestic abuse". There were sentences they wrote in letters that did not make sense sometimes and I just lost my confidence in the team. Having to make corrections costs money to the client as each email or phone call was charged for.

This was not helped by people being off sometimes when I was not told they were going to be off- so I would suddenly find another lawyer was dealing with my case, who inevitably had to be brought up to speed. At one point the advice given by the substitute lawyer was very pessimistic about my prospects of success which was extremely stressful for me; this was later looked at again by the main lawyer, who revised the advice, but only after I had pushed for it to be reconsidered after speaking to a retired family law judge who is a friend of mine.

In addition, I did not feel that leadership was taken in progressing matters. My husband's solicitor is very difficult to deal with, but I felt that no-one was suggesting a course of action when nothing had been resolved for months. In the end I felt a fresh approach was required with someone more bullish handling my case and so I have moved to a well-known, local firm. I straight away had a meeting in person and a course of action was suggested to resolve things- I am feeling much happier now. I am dealing with one lawyer all the time and she is efficient with her time, and providing very clear advice. She is used to a case like this where we are arguing against a 50-50 division of assets and is not fazed by it. I think she has about the same PQE as my Fullers lawyer, so it isn't about years of experience but the fact that the work is high quality and not being done by a para legal. It is not helpful to me to have changed lawyers in the middle of proceedings and I wish I had begun with the better known firm from the beginning.

My impression is that the work Fullers did cost me more than if I had instructed a more expensive solicitor from the beginning. I appreciate that some fees were clocked up simply chasing my husband's solicitor for an answer, but whether to do this is also a judgment call. In the end I feel it was a false economy to go for a "cheaper" firm.

I also want to say that I was not asked for any feedback from Fullers after leaving the firm. I have had to search for a way to leave online feedback. I suspect that they send feedback forms to clients they think are happy, hence the 4.9/5 approval rating online, but those who have left are not offered the opportunity to comment. I am not saying that they do not do good work for most clients, but I suspect there may be unhappy people out there who have not persevered in trying to give feedback (no doubt because they are already occupied with trying to sort out their divorces!)

In additioin, when I came back in to edit the review and add this last point about feedback, all the negative adjectives have disappeared - I can only click on positive adjectives! Pretty strange..

This review is for a different branch.

After having a dissapointing experience with my previous law firm, I am delighted to be working with someone who seems to finally “get it”. I really feel like Kerry has my back here and is looking to represent my best interests. She has listened to me and taken the time to ensure she gathers the information to really understand what has been happening and enable us to work as a team to present the best possible case we can. I also feel confident that Kerry will tell me the truth of her legal expertise and opinion and not just what I want to hear. I feel like I am definitely in confident, competent and professional hands!

This review is for a different branch.

Both Teena and Sophie make a highly stressful situation easy to understand, and they are logical in their approach. Teena has a wealth of experience, and she is relatable, empathetic and professional. I value her judgement and guidance. She offers sensible advice, and the beauty of this firm is that she delegates accordingly - which helps with costs. She is a real pleasure to deal with and i would always recommend her for future business. Sophie is a very promising asset to this firm - she is professional, friendly and relatable, and diligent.

This review is for a different branch.

Anjani and team were great all the way through the process. They were very clear and concise and explained the process.

This review is for a different branch.

A professional solicitor thoroughly studied my case and valued my opinion. She is approachable and we discuss things; if I disagree about something, she tries to explain the law to me for the best results. Sometimes, I feel as though it's her case, as she is a very organized individual. She chased the case with the other solicitor, and because of her massive effort, we won the case for the best interest of my kids.