Get advice now

Please be aware that by submitting this form, the details you have entered above will be sent directly to Richard Buxton. ReviewSolicitors are not responsible for the advice or contact you receive from the firm. Please see our Terms and conditions for more information.

Unfortunately Richard Buxton are not currently taking on any new clients at the moment through ReviewSolicitors.

In order to help you get expert legal advice as quickly as possible, one of our team can recommend another highly rated law firm who are taking on new clients and forward your request on to them. They will then be in contact to confirm your appointment. We will also email you with the details of the new firm.

Get advice now

Richard Buxton

01223328933
5.0/5
2 Client Reviews Leave a review
View map
Richard Buxton

How Richard Buxton Compares

Value for money

!

Limited data.

This firm - 100%
National Average
Poor Competitive Excellent

Excellent does not necessarily mean ‘cheap’. It means that clients thought that the level of service received was Excellent for what they paid.

This score has been calculated using up to the last 300 reviews left by clients of Richard Buxton on ReviewSolicitors.

As part of our review questionnaire we ask reviewer questions about the value for money they felt they received by using Richard Buxton. These questions include:

  • Value for money (a rating of 1-5)
  • How much were you initially quoted or how much did you expect to pay?
  • Approximately how much did you end up spending for the legal services provided (ignoring disbursements and court fees)
  • Did you think this was underpriced, overpriced or about right?
  • Overall experience

We use data science to amalgamate the answers to these questions and create a ‘ReviewSolicitors score’ out of 100. The above chart representation score is a simple percentage representation of the averaged score across those who have reviewed this law firm.

Underpriced 0%
Overpriced 50%
About Right 50%

If you would like to read more about how we work with our review data please see our Transparency section.

Read moreless...

Would recommend to
friends and family

!

Limited data.

This firm - 100%
National Average
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

ReviewSolicitors uses our community data to show you how many clients used Richard Buxton and have had a satisfactory experience where they have indicated that they would recommend the services of the law firm to their friends and family.

You can use this data to see how Richard Buxton performs against other law firms nationally. A score close to 100% indicates that this firm is highly valued by their clients.

As part of our review questionnaire we ask the question:

"Would you recommend this firm to somebody else?"

The reviewer can select either “Yes” or “No”.

The above score is a simple percentage representation of the total amount of clients who selected the “Yes” option:

Yes 100%
No 0%

If you would like to read more about how we work with our review data please see our Transparency section.

Read moreless...

Satisfied with
outcome of matter

!

Limited data.

This firm - 100%
National Average
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

ReviewSolicitors uses our community data to show you how many clients used Richard Buxton and were satisfied with the outcome of their matter. Being satisfied with the outcome of your matter is an important consideration to have in mind.

You can use this data to see how Richard Buxton compares to the national average of clients being satisfied with the outcome of their matter after instructing a solicitor.

As part of our review questionnaire we ask the question:

"Were you satisfied with the outcome of your case?"

The reviewer can select either “Yes” or “No”.

The above score is a simple percentage representation of the total amount of clients who selected the “Yes” option:

Yes 100%
No 0%

If you would like to read more about how we work with our review data please see our Transparency section.

Read moreless...

Rankings by area of expertise

The rankings below show the areas of expertise that Richard Buxton offers to clients. You can see how good the service offered is in comparison to all other law firms nationally.

Locally

Nationally

Consumer
10th / 15
1842nd / 4585
Housing & Property
4th / 10
1300th / 4238
Commercial Property
9th / 14
1571st / 3311
Regulations
8th / 13
943rd / 2565
Personal Injury
6th / 8
1204th / 2369
Clinical Negligence
4th / 5
592nd / 941
Human rights
4th / 7
329th / 748
Notary
5th / 8
309th / 711

Data shown above is based on the reviews and client feedback collected by ReviewSolicitors over the last 12 months.

Become Verified

Richard Buxton only have 2 reviews listed here

You may want to discover a firm with an established and proven reputation on ReviewSolicitors

Top Rated Law Firms - Highly Recommended and Recently Used By Clients Like You

Barr Ellison LLP

4.7/5

182 reviews

Client Favourite

Fullers Family Law Limited

4.9/5

554 reviews

Highly Rated

Poole Alcock LLP

4.9/5

3535 reviews

Recently Instructed

Review Sources

Client Reviews

5.0/5

Reviews summary

  • Excellent

    2

  • Very Good

    0

  • Average

    0

  • Poor

    0

  • Awful

    0

Overall experience

  • Value For Money
  • Communication
  • Initial Impressions
  • Approachability
  • Documentation Accuracy
  • Legal knowledge
⠀

⠀

February 21, 2025

Report to admin

Collected on:

Expert Planning Representation That Delivers Results

Susy Gandy at Richard Buxton Solicitors provided outstanding planning consultation and representation, demonstrating deep expertise, strategic thinking, and meticulous attention to detail. Her guidance through complex planning and enforcement matters was exceptional, leading to a highly successful outcome—both in objecting to inappropriate planning proposals and securing full compliance with an extant enforcement notice. I cannot recommend her highly enough to anyone requiring expert navigation of the intricate and often challenging planning and enforcement process.

Was this review helpful?

Daniel
Housing & Property

Matter Type:

Planning

Daniel

May 23, 2024

Report to admin

Collected on:

Opposing Planning application

Paul Taylor and Paul Wyard supported a small rural community to oppose a planning application which was successfully refused. They then supported us to oppose an appeal. The appeal was dismissed. Their professionalism, guidance and assistance has been invaluable to us throughout this time. They appreciated our concerns, provided explanations, ensured we remained focused and realistic. The assertive professional letters they produced and all communication with us was swift, accurate and detailed. Thank you so much.

Was this review helpful?

About this branch

Regulated by

Solicitors Regulation Authority

Legal services

Personal areas of law

  • Clinical Negligence
    • Accident and Emergency Claims
    • Amputation Negligence Claims
    • Anaesthetic Awareness Claims
    • Birth Defect and Wrongful Birth Claims
    • Birth Injury Claims
    • Birth Injury To Mother Claims
    • Blood Transfusion Claims
    • Bowel Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Breast Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Breast Surgery Compensation Claims
    • C. Difficile Claims
    • Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Cauda Equina Syndrome Claims
    • Cerebral Palsy Claims
    • Cervical Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Clinical Negligence
    • Cochlear Implant Claims
    • Cosmetic Dentistry Claims
    • Cosmetic Surgery Claims
    • Defective Medical Device Claims
    • Dental Negligence
    • Dental Negligence Claims
    • Dermal Filler Compensation Claims
    • Diabetes Claims
    • Erb’s Palsy Compensation Claims
    • Eye Surgery Claims
    • Failed Sterilisation Claims
    • Fatal Medical Negligence Claims and Inquests
    • Faulty Defibrillator Claims
    • Fertility Negligence Claims
    • GP Negligence Claims
    • Group B Streptococcus Claims
    • Hospital Negligence Claims
    • Knee Replacement Claims
    • Laser Eye Surgery Claims
    • Laser Treatment Claims
    • Lung Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • MRSA Claims
    • Medical Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Medical Negligence
    • Meningitis Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Metal-On-Metal Hip Replacement Claims
    • Misdiagnosed Miscarriage Claims
    • Nerve Damage Claims
    • Nerve Injury Claims
    • Ophthalmic Negligence Claims
    • Oral Cancer Claims
    • Orthopaedic Negligence Claims
    • Ovarian Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Pancreatic Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Periodontal Disease Claims
    • Pregnancy and Gynaecology Injury Claims
    • Pressure Sore Claims
    • Prostate Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Restorative Dentistry Claims
    • Sepsis Negligence Claims
    • Skin Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Sorin Stockert 3T Heater-Cooler Claims
    • Spinal Surgery Claims
    • Stillbirth Compensation Claims
    • Stroke Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Surgery Compensation Claims
    • Surgical and Transvaginal Mesh Claims
    • Testicular Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
  • Consumer
    • Consumer Disputes
    • Litigation - Breach of contract
    • Litigation - Insurance disputes
    • Litigation - M&A and warranty disputes
    • Litigation - Product liability claims
    • Litigation - Property litigation claims
    • Litigation - Trust and pension issues
    • Litigation Law
  • Housing & Property
    • Planning
  • Human rights
    • Human rights
  • Notary
    • Notary
  • Personal Injury
    • Against The Council
    • Benefits Available To Asbestos Victims
    • Diffuse Mesothelioma Payment Scheme
    • Gym Injury Compensation
    • Personal Injury Law
    • Welfare Issues After Serious Injury

Business areas of law

  • Commercial Property
    • Planning law
  • Regulations
    • Environment