Shamir
Collected on:
Awful. Do not use and I do no not recommend.
Requested case details and case reference number and they do not provide any information. Awful.
Was this review helpful?
Purcell Parker Ltd
01212369781
- Address
- B4 7LR
- 01212369781
- www.purcellparker.co.uk
View map
How Purcell Parker Ltd Compares
Value for money
Excellent does not necessarily mean ‘cheap’. It means that clients thought that the level of service received was Excellent for what they paid.
This score has been calculated using up to the last 300 reviews left by clients of Purcell Parker Ltd on ReviewSolicitors.
As part of our review questionnaire we ask reviewer questions about the value for money they felt they received by using Purcell Parker Ltd. These questions include:
- Value for money (a rating of 1-5)
- How much were you initially quoted or how much did you expect to pay?
- Approximately how much did you end up spending for the legal services provided (ignoring disbursements and court fees)
- Did you think this was underpriced, overpriced or about right?
- Overall experience
We use data science to amalgamate the answers to these questions and create a ‘ReviewSolicitors score’ out of 100. The above chart representation score is a simple percentage representation of the averaged score across those who have reviewed this law firm.
If you would like to read more about how we work with our review data please see our Transparency section.
Read moreless...
Would recommend to
friends and family
ReviewSolicitors uses our community data to show you how many clients used Purcell Parker Ltd and have had a satisfactory experience where they have indicated that they would recommend the services of the law firm to their friends and family.
You can use this data to see how Purcell Parker Ltd performs against other law firms nationally. A score close to 100% indicates that this firm is highly valued by their clients.
As part of our review questionnaire we ask the question:
"Would you recommend this firm to somebody else?"
The reviewer can select either “Yes” or “No”.
The above score is a simple percentage representation of the total amount of clients who selected the “Yes” option:
If you would like to read more about how we work with our review data please see our Transparency section.
Read moreless...
Satisfied with
outcome of matter
ReviewSolicitors uses our community data to show you how many clients used Purcell Parker Ltd and were satisfied with the outcome of their matter. Being satisfied with the outcome of your matter is an important consideration to have in mind.
You can use this data to see how Purcell Parker Ltd compares to the national average of clients being satisfied with the outcome of their matter after instructing a solicitor.
As part of our review questionnaire we ask the question:
"Were you satisfied with the outcome of your case?"
The reviewer can select either “Yes” or “No”.
The above score is a simple percentage representation of the total amount of clients who selected the “Yes” option:
If you would like to read more about how we work with our review data please see our Transparency section.
Read moreless...
Rankings by area of expertise
The rankings below show the areas of expertise that Purcell Parker Ltd offers to clients. You can see how good the service offered is in comparison to all other law firms nationally.
Locally
Nationally
Data shown above is based on the reviews and client feedback collected by ReviewSolicitors over the last 12 months.
Become Verified
Purcell Parker Ltd has Not Been Verified by ReviewSolicitors
You may want to discover a firm with an established and proven reputation on ReviewSolicitors
Top Rated Law Firms - Highly Recommended and Recently Used By Clients Like You
Review Sources
Client Reviews
Reviews summary
-
Excellent
-
Very Good
-
Average
-
Poor
-
Awful
Overall experience
- Value For Money
- Communication
- Initial Impressions
- Approachability
- Documentation Accuracy
- Legal knowledge
A
Collected on:
Absolutely happy
Mr Richard Ellis done his work(magic) within 30min I was released, after beeing in custody for 35.5hrs
Was this review helpful?
Gareth
Collected on:
Patience
Well 14 months on remand for 3 ABH charges, 2 custody time limit extensions and a few pre trials, reviews etc, not guilty all the way, I wasn't a weekly phoner but when I did phone, I was dealt with professionally and politely, they had to deal with tears the lot, now the right result was had, bust case 2nd August this year..... Special mention to James there, what a legend ! Thank you for putting up with me and my emotional state.... Would recommend these deffo......
Was this review helpful?
Matter Type:
Assault
robert
Collected on:
great solicitor
had a great result off the magistrates yesterday thanks to the professionalism of CHARMAINE ROBINSON she was brilliant made me feel at ease as i was very nervous when i entered the court house. and once she had spoke to me i felt more at ease she put my case over brilliantly to the magistrates absolutely first class solicitor
Was this review helpful?
Matter Type:
Domestic Violence
Martin
Collected on:
Great experience
I received the highest level of professionalism in court today Chris Stewart is a very professional caring approachable solicitor he always has your very best interests at heart keeps you constantly informed and updated with what’s happening
I would highly recommend Chris to anyone needing a very professional solicitor Chris is a real nice guy to who makes you feel comfortable in knowing he has his finger constantly on the pulse and nothing slips past his attention he pays great attention to detail all in all a great experience I would also like to add jackie cain is a great asset to Purcell Parker she kept me updated with everything that was happening all in all a great experience many thanks
Regards martin
Was this review helpful?
Atif
Collected on:
Great Representation..
Excellent work conducted by Spencer Stephens and Wendy Lawley who collectively filed for Section.8 persuading Prosecution to disclose evidence held against me. Prosecution had false evidence from the complaint (Sakhi Rezaie) which was used to frame me as I the whistle of his crypo-fraud scheme. He still continues to pursue and defraud money from victims across the country.
I was acquitted earlier this month. Can't thank them enough for their efforts..
Was this review helpful?
Matter Type:
Prison law
Peter
Collected on:
Securing my recall release
I would like to thank Tiernan Davis and Sadie Rice for their excellent representation on my recall and other matters having secured my release. Brilliant job!
Was this review helpful?
Tina
Collected on:
Fantastic
We would like to personally thank Mr. JOSEPH KEATING for everything he did in regards to the case. Couldn’t recommend him enough. We are all overwhelmed with the great result.
Was this review helpful?
About this branch
Regulated by
Legal services
Personal areas of law
-
Clinical Negligence
- Accident and Emergency Claims
- Amputation Negligence Claims
- Anaesthetic Awareness Claims
- Birth Defect and Wrongful Birth Claims
- Birth Injury Claims
- Birth Injury To Mother Claims
- Blood Transfusion Claims
- Bowel Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
- Breast Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
- Breast Surgery Compensation Claims
- C. Difficile Claims
- Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
- Cauda Equina Syndrome Claims
- Cerebral Palsy Claims
- Cervical Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
- Clinical Negligence
- Cochlear Implant Claims
- Cosmetic Dentistry Claims
- Cosmetic Surgery Claims
- Defective Medical Device Claims
- Dental Negligence
- Dental Negligence Claims
- Dermal Filler Compensation Claims
- Diabetes Claims
- Erb’s Palsy Compensation Claims
- Eye Surgery Claims
- Failed Sterilisation Claims
- Fatal Medical Negligence Claims and Inquests
- Faulty Defibrillator Claims
- Fertility Negligence Claims
- GP Negligence Claims
- Group B Streptococcus Claims
- Hospital Negligence Claims
- Knee Replacement Claims
- Laser Eye Surgery Claims
- Laser Treatment Claims
- Lung Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
- MRSA Claims
- Medical Misdiagnosis Claims
- Medical Negligence
- Meningitis Misdiagnosis Claims
- Metal-On-Metal Hip Replacement Claims
- Misdiagnosed Miscarriage Claims
- Nerve Damage Claims
- Nerve Injury Claims
- Ophthalmic Negligence Claims
- Oral Cancer Claims
- Orthopaedic Negligence Claims
- Ovarian Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
- Pancreatic Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
- Periodontal Disease Claims
- Pregnancy and Gynaecology Injury Claims
- Pressure Sore Claims
- Prostate Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
- Restorative Dentistry Claims
- Sepsis Negligence Claims
- Skin Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
- Sorin Stockert 3T Heater-Cooler Claims
- Spinal Surgery Claims
- Stillbirth Compensation Claims
- Stroke Misdiagnosis Claims
- Surgery Compensation Claims
- Surgical and Transvaginal Mesh Claims
- Testicular Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
-
Consumer
- Consumer Disputes
- Litigation - Breach of contract
- Litigation - Insurance disputes
- Litigation - M&A and warranty disputes
- Litigation - Product liability claims
- Litigation - Property litigation claims
- Litigation - Trust and pension issues
- Litigation Law
-
Crime/ Criminal Defence
- Assault
- Business Crime
- Criminal Damage
- Criminal defence - All
- Drugs offences
- Fraud
- Murder and Manslaughter
- Professional Conduct
- Regulatory Defence
- Theft
-
Employment
- Military
-
Human rights
- Human rights
-
Immigration
- Applications for British citizenship
- Asylum applications and appeals
- Citizenship
- EEA Family Permits
- EEA Registration Cards
- EEA Residence Permits
- Human Rights
-
Notary
- Notary
-
Personal Injury
- Against The Council
- Benefits Available To Asbestos Victims
- Diffuse Mesothelioma Payment Scheme
- Gym Injury Compensation
- Personal Injury Law
- Welfare Issues After Serious Injury
-
Welfare & Benefits
- Benefits
- Housing
-
Wills, Trusts & Probate
- Probate
- Wills