Get advice now

Get advice now

Hargreaves Mounteney Limited

01614400131

Also known as :

  • Mounteney Solicitors
View map
Hargreaves Mounteney Limited

How Hargreaves Mounteney Limited Compares

Value for money

!

Limited data.

This firm - 73%
National Average
Poor Competitive Excellent

Excellent does not necessarily mean ‘cheap’. It means that clients thought that the level of service received was Excellent for what they paid.

This score has been calculated using up to the last 300 reviews left by clients of Hargreaves Mounteney Limited on ReviewSolicitors.

As part of our review questionnaire we ask reviewer questions about the value for money they felt they received by using Hargreaves Mounteney Limited. These questions include:

  • Value for money (a rating of 1-5)
  • How much were you initially quoted or how much did you expect to pay?
  • Approximately how much did you end up spending for the legal services provided (ignoring disbursements and court fees)
  • Did you think this was underpriced, overpriced or about right?
  • Overall experience

We use data science to amalgamate the answers to these questions and create a ‘ReviewSolicitors score’ out of 100. The above chart representation score is a simple percentage representation of the averaged score across those who have reviewed this law firm.

Underpriced 0%
Overpriced 100%
About Right 0%

If you would like to read more about how we work with our review data please see our Transparency section.

Read moreless...

Would recommend to
friends and family

This firm - 67%
National Average
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

ReviewSolicitors uses our community data to show you how many clients used Hargreaves Mounteney Limited and have had a satisfactory experience where they have indicated that they would recommend the services of the law firm to their friends and family.

You can use this data to see how Hargreaves Mounteney Limited performs against other law firms nationally. A score close to 100% indicates that this firm is highly valued by their clients.

As part of our review questionnaire we ask the question:

"Would you recommend this firm to somebody else?"

The reviewer can select either “Yes” or “No”.

The above score is a simple percentage representation of the total amount of clients who selected the “Yes” option:

Yes 67%
No 33%

If you would like to read more about how we work with our review data please see our Transparency section.

Read moreless...

Satisfied with
outcome of matter

This firm - 67%
National Average
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

ReviewSolicitors uses our community data to show you how many clients used Hargreaves Mounteney Limited and were satisfied with the outcome of their matter. Being satisfied with the outcome of your matter is an important consideration to have in mind.

You can use this data to see how Hargreaves Mounteney Limited compares to the national average of clients being satisfied with the outcome of their matter after instructing a solicitor.

As part of our review questionnaire we ask the question:

"Were you satisfied with the outcome of your case?"

The reviewer can select either “Yes” or “No”.

The above score is a simple percentage representation of the total amount of clients who selected the “Yes” option:

Yes 67%
No 33%

If you would like to read more about how we work with our review data please see our Transparency section.

Read moreless...

Rankings by area of expertise

The rankings below show the areas of expertise that Hargreaves Mounteney Limited offers to clients. You can see how good the service offered is in comparison to all other law firms nationally.

Data shown above is based on the reviews and client feedback collected by ReviewSolicitors over the last 12 months.

Become Verified

Hargreaves Mounteney Limited only have 6 reviews listed here

You may want to discover a firm with an established and proven reputation on ReviewSolicitors


Top Rated Law Firms - Highly Recommended and Recently Used By Clients Like You

Review Sources

Client Reviews

3.7/5

Reviews summary

  • Excellent

    4
  • Very Good

    0
  • Average

    0
  • Poor

    0
  • Awful

    2

Overall experience

  • Value For Money
  • Communication
  • Initial Impressions
  • Approachability
  • Documentation Accuracy
  • Legal knowledge
Dawn

Dawn

October 17, 2024

Report to admin

Collected on:

Conveyancing

We recently sold our parental home using Sam from Mounteneys. He was professional, polite and very quick with all responses.
He kept both executors informed with an understanding of the different personalities and emotions. Everything went very smoothly due to Sam’s excellent communication skills.
We would definitely recommend using Sam from Mounteneys .

Was this review helpful?

Dawn

Dawn

October 16, 2024

Report to admin

Collected on:

Conveyance

Sam was polite and professional from the start, quickly responding to our challenging situation of the sale of my father’s home after his death with empathy and kindness. He let us know we were in very good hands and read the different personalities very well of both the executors. Thank you Sam for all of you help during this difficult time .
We
Would highly recommend Mounteneys.

Was this review helpful?

Julie

Julie

July 11, 2024

Report to admin

Collected on:

Conveyances

Just used Mounteney Solicitors for my sale and purchase, I honestly cannot thank them enough, they went above and beyond to get it across the finish line.
I would have no hesitation in using Mounteney solicitors again, Amanda, Katie and Caroline are just so professional, excellent service by all

Was this review helpful?

Stephanie

Stephanie

June 25, 2023

Report to admin

Collected on:

Wasted our time

Terrible experience with this firm. Rang up and explained that we were changing our names on the Land Registry after getting married and filling in an AP1, and needed a solicitor to sign and say we had changed our names. Two separate receptionists confirmed this would be £10.

Turned up at the solicitor's branch and showed the solicitor our forms, he again confirmed this would be £10. He required quite a lot of time and assistance to fill in the forms - for example having to leave the room to go and get his SRA number, needing to read the firm's address off the back of a stamp, and us having to point out what bits required signing. It was quite obvious he was new (which he confirmed) so we were happy to be patient and he did complete the forms. We confirmed he didn't need anything else, paid in cash, and left.

We were almost home when a trainee solicitor from the branch rang to say that what we had got the solicitor to do was £120 worth of work and not £10. The tone was very accusatory and we felt she was insinuating that we had done this deliberately, as though we were some kind of scam artists. She was clearly very frustrated and said that our forms were now void as they would tell Land Registry that they weren't authorised. We were told if we wanted the forms to be valid we would have to come back and pay an extra £110.

The firm did not seem to have much care for the fact that this was their error, and that we shouldn't have been able to 'scam' their qualified solicitor by getting him to do more work than what they had quoted us for. On a later phone call the trainee solicitor did say sorry and acknowledged that perhaps they shouldn't have left their newest solicitor to do that job alone, and that they had been concerned about how long the work was taking but didn't intervene. They have agreed to pay the £10 back if we return the forms to them (I think they're panicking that they can't actually tell Land Registry our forms aren't valid because they have no formal record of the work they did or our full details) but it doesn't make up for the fact that we wasted our morning, a 30 mile round trip, two passport photos, printouts of the paperwork, and still don't have our forms done.

What upset us most was the inference that we tried to mislead them, when they gave us a solicitor who needed more help/training and did the work wrong. In all honesty I expected them to acknowledge their error and let us keep the forms. Quite laughable that they thought we would return and give them an extra £110 after they were rude to us and messed up the work. I think they were most worried that we had forms which they shouldn't have let us walk out with and anxious to get them back.

Wouldn't trust them again and have now taken our services elsewhere.

Was this review helpful?

max

Matter Type:

Possession and repossession proceedings

max

October 04, 2020

Report to admin

Collected on:

Great service from Jonathan

Jonathan and Eden (based in the Bramhall office I think) took the time to understand all the detail of my possession case, which unfortunately is very complex, and produce a carefully considered legal approach. Prices were very reasonable considering the amount of work involved.

Was this review helpful?

Matt

Matter Type:

Residential Conveyancing

Matt

July 19, 2019

Report to admin

Collected on:

PLEASE READ IF YOU ARE CONSIDERING USING THIS FIRM.

My review will be honest and will cover the good and the bad points, unfortunately the bad points far outweigh the goods, hence the 1 star. You can also see that I rarely leave bad reviews, I always give companies a chance to rectify problems and will praise good service, so the fact that I have had to leave this to warn other people shows just how bad the experience has been.

I needed a solicitor to assist with the purchase of my freehold, and after obtaining several quotes from various solicitors I decided to proceed with Mounteney. Another firm had warned me about other solicitors having hidden costs, but I put this down to a marketing ploy, unfortunately they were right, but more on this later. Obtaining the quote was quick and easy with an almost instantaneous response. They weren’t the cheapest, but a member of my family had used them, albeit to carry out the relatively routine (for solicitors) task of the purchase of a house and had had a smooth experience. We agreed a price for them to assist with the purchase of the freehold, but I also made it clear that I would like for them to assist with the removal of some covenants from the original lease, they replied to say that they couldn’t guarantee that all covenants would be removed, but I knew this and as I only wanted a couple of the covenants removed, I proceeded. I signed all of the required documents and returned them without delay, where I was informed that the new deed would likely take around 2 weeks. I waited 3 weeks and chased, as I hadn’t heard anything…nothing. I allowed another week and sent another email requesting an update where I was told the deed had “just come through”. I checked over the deed and had a few questions, as the covenants I had specifically requested be removed were still in it, and there was no mention from them that they were in the process of negotiating this.

Whilst waiting for a response to my email questioning the covenants and where they were up to, I called the Heald Green office to check if we could drop in to have our ID verified, being told that we could pop in anytime. The day after, we (my fiancée and I) went to the office and was greeted by a lovely lady on the front desk who promptly verified our ID. Before we left, we asked her to check with the lady that we were dealing with to see if anything else would be needed, so that we could arrange to bring this in, keen to not prolong the process. A minute or so later we were ushered into a meeting room where we were greeted by a lady we hadn’t met or spoken to before, she either didn’t introduce herself or did so in such a way that neither me or my fiancée could catch her name but lady I would check the website and found out that she was the director of the Heald Green office. I looked up who she was because (and this is where things went south) the way in which she handled us as customers was atrocious. I asked questions about where things were up to with the covenant removal, to which I was basically told, it won’t happen as we are in a new build estate and it won’t be possible. When I replied to explain that we knew it was possible, because the very covenants we wanted removed had been removed for another couple on the site when they bought their freehold…her flippant and assumed response, “the other couple probably bought from a different builder so you cannot compare the two”. When we pointed out the entire site was built by the same builder, there was no response, she just moved on to bad mouth new build houses and how she hates them. Doing this in front of a couple who have bought a new build house (and are very happy with it) is extremely unprofessional. Nevertheless we moved on…

I re-raised the question about the covenants, and again was given a brush off. Now considering that I made it clear that the removal of covenants was to be part of the deal to be basically told it wasn’t going to happen didn’t sit well, and it appeared that it wasn’t going to happen because Mounteney’s couldn’t be bothered fighting the case for us, not because it wasn’t possible to have them removed, as we had already proven it was possible. I mentioned this to the director and again, a flippant response followed…”well I charge £300 plus VAT an hour, so you won’t want me racking up bills or your will be upset with me”. This started alarm bells, as we were now being told that there would be extortionate extra charges for something we requested a quotation on in the beginning. Remember when I said the other firm warned me…well hear it was, happening as they had predicted.

Her attitude meant that we felt we weren’t going to get anywhere, so we decided to leave, feeling very angry, stressed and concerned at the state of things. I decided to send an email to the owner of the business, which Mounteney’s request their customers to do should they have a complaint. I thought this direct approach implied that this rather small firm (compared to the competition) had a rather personal approach and so I was confident that our meeting was just a blip, expecting a pleasant response from the owner, where we could put this experience to bed and move on. This is where things went from really bad, to quite unbelievable. My complaint email, which was politely worded (I can put a copy of this on this review should Mounteney’s come respond to this to say otherwise…but I will also show their horrendous responses) was balanced and praised the individuals of whom I had had a pleasant dealing with and raised concerns about our meeting, which might I add I didn’t expect (I only asked for the kind lady to check if anything else was needed and merely expected an instruction back, if anything). The response I got was totally unprofessional, which the owner stated, and I quote was a “meaningless verbal assault I assume is intended to intimidate – a strange tactic to adopt toward a professional litigator”. It is because I was raising a complaint with a “professional litigator” that I was shocked at his response. Might I add, that just because you are classed as a “professional” doesn’t mean you are acting as one, your attitude and behaviour dictates this, not your profession.

He basically was unhappy that I was complaining, and effectively told me to “go away”. He offered to “walk away” with no fee, which I of course gladly accepted and I do not want to pay these people a penny, instead taking my business to a more deserving company. I believe he offered this because they mis-quoted and it effectively would get them out of having to cover the cost of additional work for free. In addition to this, there was more mis-quoting on costs, as the owner bluntly referred me to their terms stating their additional costs, showing them at £240 plus VAT per hour for a director’s work, yet the director at Heald Green quoted £300 per hour…this doesn’t add up, which is it??

When I replied to say that I was shocked at his response, he again replied in an unprofessional manner by stating that as I had a complaint “he should PROBABLY send me the complaints procedure”. When I stated that he shouldn’t treat paying customers in this way, his response was, and again I quote “I was unaware you were a paying customer – I’ll check your ledger and refund your payment tomorrow.” To which I replied “From your comment below, does this mean that a client who you are working for but is yet to pay is treated differently to someone who has paid up front, somehow I doubt it...”, he didn’t reply.
***To summarise - The owner of the company simply does not care about his customers, which is why I implore you to use an alternative firm, and give Mounteney’s a wide berth. They will mis-quote you, deny it, even though I have the mis-quotation in writing and will then condescend you, belittle you and refuse to assist when you raise a complaint. If this review means that just one person doesn’t have to have the appalling experience that I have had, this review will be worthwhile, but I hope that it has a far bigger impact, and only then will the owner consider treating his customers in an acceptable manner***

Was this review helpful?

About this branch

Regulated by

Solicitors Regulation Authority

Legal services

Personal areas of law

  • Consumer
    • Dispute resolution - civil mediation
    • Litigation - Breach of contract
    • Litigation - Insurance disputes
    • Litigation - M&A and warranty disputes
    • Litigation - Product liability claims
    • Litigation - Property litigation claims
    • Litigation - Trust and pension issues
    • Litigation Law
  • Crime/ Criminal Defence
    • Assault
    • Business Crime
    • Criminal Damage
    • Criminal defence - All
    • Drugs offences
    • Murder and Manslaughter
    • Professional Conduct
    • Regulatory Defence
    • Theft
  • Family Law
    • Adoption, Surrogacy, Care and Special Guardianship
    • Asset protection and tax mitigation
    • Child Arrangements Following Divorce
    • Child Law
    • Child Relocation After Divorce
    • Child contact
    • Children
    • Children Act proceedings
    • Civil Partnership Dissolution
    • Civil partnerships
    • Cohabitation agreements and disputes
    • Cohabitation and Unmarried Relationships
    • Collaborative Law
    • Divorce After A Brain Or Other Serious Injury
    • Domestic Abuse
    • Family Mediation
    • Family law
    • Financial Matters
    • Grandparents' Rights
    • Inheritance Act claims
    • Injunctions
    • Matrimonial finance
    • Out Of Court Divorce
    • Parental responsibility, paternity disputes, surrogacy
    • Pension and property advice
    • Pre and Post Nuptial Agreements
    • Separation Agreement
    • Social Services
    • Unmarried Couples' Rights
  • Housing & Property
    • Anti-social Behaviour
    • Boundary Disputes
    • Buying at auction
    • Declarations of trusts
    • Deeds of Gifts
    • Deeds of easements, variation, deeds of rectifications
    • Dilapidation Claims
    • Evicting Squatters and Trespassers
    • Exclusivity and lock-out agreements
    • Extending your Lease
    • Freehold Enfranchisement
    • Housing Associations
    • Housing Management
    • Housing disputes
    • Injunctions
    • Investment and buy to let properties
    • Landlord and Tenant
    • Lease Extensions
    • Leasehold properties
    • Matrimonial transfers
    • New home purchases and sales
    • Option agreements and conditional contracts
    • Possession and repossession proceedings
    • Property Disputes
    • Purchase and Sale
    • Remortgaging
    • Renting and Tenancy Agreements
    • Repossessions
    • Residential Conveyancing
    • Restrictive Covenants, Easements and Wayleaves
    • Right of First Refusal
    • Right of Way and Rights to Light
    • Right to Manage
    • Service Charge Disputes
    • Service Charge Recovery
    • Tenancy Breaches, Injunctions and Forfeiture Claims
    • Tenant Eviction
    • Transfer of title
    • Transfers of equity
    • Transfers of parts of land
    • Unpaid Rent, Service or Ground Charges
  • Human rights
    • Human rights
  • Immigration
    • Administrative reviews, appeals and judicial reviews
    • Ancestry visas
    • Applications for discretionary leave
    • Applications to extend leave to remain or for settlement
    • Deportation appeals
    • Entry clearance applications and appeals
    • Family Based Visas
    • Family Reunion Applications / Appeals
    • Family Visit Visa Applications /Appeals
    • General Visit Visa Applications / Appeals
    • Illegal Workers and Civil Penalties
    • Immigration Law
    • Indefinite leave to remain applications
    • Marriage Applications/Appeals
    • Nationality, Citizenship, Registration application
    • Partner and family visas
    • Re-entry bans
    • Settlement Applications and indefinite leave to remain appeals
    • Tier 1 (investors, entrepreneurs and exceptional talent)
    • Tier 2 (sponsored skilled workers)
    • Tier 4 (students)
    • Tier 5 (temporary workers)
    • UK ancestry
    • Visas
  • Wills, Trusts & Probate
    • Probate
    • Trusts
    • Wills

Business areas of law

  • Charities
    • Charities
  • Commercial Property
    • Commercial Leases
    • Commercial mortgages
    • Developer disputes
    • Development plot sales
    • Environmental policy law
    • Finance
    • Investment purchases and Buy to Let
    • Landlord and tenant
    • Purchase and Sale Of Commercial Property
    • Purchase of development land
    • Rights of way issues
    • Sales or purchases of shops, factories, warehouses, offices and licensed premises
  • Company & Commercial
    • Agency agreements
    • Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
    • Asset Tracing
    • Business structures and joint ventures
    • Commercial Law
    • Commercial Litigation Matters
    • Competition law
    • Contractual Disputes
    • Corporate Law
    • Corporate finance
    • Data Protection
    • Franchising
    • Insolvency and Bankruptcy
    • Intellectual Property
    • Management buyouts
    • Merchandising and sponsorship
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Mis-sold Interest Rate Swap Agreements
    • Partnership and LLP law
    • Sales and Purchases
    • Setting up a business
    • Share option schemes
    • Shareholder Agreements
    • Shareholder and Partnership Disputes
    • Statutory Demands
    • Summary Judgment
    • Unfair Loan Charges
  • Dispute Resolution
    • Mediation
  • IT & Intellectual Property
    • Advertising and Marketing Compliance
    • Anti-Counterfeiting and Anti-Piracy
    • Computer and IT Law
    • Confidential Information, Know-How and Trade Secrets
    • Copyright
    • Dealing with intellectual property infringements
    • Design rights and product designs
    • Domain Names
    • GDPR
    • Intellectual Property Litigation and Dispute Resolution
    • Patents
    • Personality and Image Rights
    • Trade Marks and Designs
  • Regulations
    • Health and Safety